| Competency 1: Climate Adaptation and Resilience Literacy |
| 1.2 |
Use evidence-informed climate adaptation strategies to develop or select feasible solutions, recommendations, and action plans |
- Assesses reliability and validity of the evidence informing strategies
- Evaluates an action within an adaptation strategy to inform the design of an action research question.
|
| 1.3 |
Examine the role of reconciliation as a component of climate adaptation and low carbon resiliency |
- Describes and applies the principle of how
worldviews guide perspectives on science and social issues.
- Identifies reliable and accurate sources for Indigenous climate adaptation and resilience science and concepts.
|
| Competency 2: Critical, Creative, and Transdisciplinary Thinking |
| 2.2 |
Communicate effectively using coherent, synthesized, well organized, edited, logical, and fully supported work |
- Makes clear and relevant contributions
- Uses style, language and form of communication suitable for the context and audience
- Synthesizes information and makes well-supported arguments
|
| Competency 3: Research Literacy |
| 3.1 |
Ask relevant, probing, and detailed questions to deepen knowledge that informs arguments, choices, and practices |
- Generates questions relevant to arguments, choices, and practices
- Uses questions to probe more deeply into issues and details
- Applies gained knowledge to arguments, choices, and practices
|
| 3.2 |
Evaluate the rigor and validity of adaptation research and information with a critical lens to deepen knowledge that informs arguments, choices, and practices |
- Compares the rigor and validity of evaluated research to a high-quality exemplar,
- Applies a critical approach to research, literature, and information
- Identifies sources for credible information and research
- Conducts a systematic search for information
|
| 3.3 |
Illustrate the use and limitations of information and theory in the field of climate adaptation |
- Identifies myths and sources of misinformation
- Identifies gaps in scientific information, theories, and knowledge
- Describes how myths, misinformation, and gaps in scientific information may affect public perception and understanding
|
